About food intolerance

The food intolerance are “not allergic allergies.” This definition dates back to 1991, when the allergy Kaplan presented his article that described the existence of states that allergy was not possible to correlate immunoglobulin E (IgE). So the first thing to understand is that traditional allergy and food intolerance are not the same thing.
If a substance to which it is intolerant reaches the body’s defenses (white blood cells, particularly lymphocytes) are diverted from their normal duties to deal all aggressore, thus creating a decrease in general immune defenses.

Because food intolerances are responsible for defense of a minor, some diseases could be significantly affected: rhinitis, asthma, conjunctivitis, dermatitis, dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis, colitis. For others suggested the importance of the role of the immune food, but it seems too early to include it among the factors to consider. What is important to note is that the relationship between pathology and intolerance is probabilistic in the sense that the disease may depend intolerance, not necessarily depend on it. Using the law of total healing, the person who suffers from a disease and was diagnosed as an intolerance, when eliminate intolerance, must heal his problem: a general slight improvement or a simple extension of relapses must to continue the investigation of causes beyond food. In other words, you should not run into the monocausa, by relating the status of each subject to its profile food.

Comments are closed.